caching differences between 6.5 and 6.6

This is the place to help test and discuss Version 6 Beta releases.

caching differences between 6.5 and 6.6

Postby cat_man » Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:09 am

I have a core 2 duo laptop with a SSD running win 8.1. When downloading headers daily from about 80 GOGs, newsbin uses little of the 200/200 cache but it does create up to about 10 import file caches, which take several minutes to finish. This was much less so in 6.5/ Comments or ideas?
User avatar
cat_man
Seasoned User
Seasoned User
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:40 am
Location: Texas

Registered Newsbin User since: 04/08/05

Re: caching differences between 6.5 and 6.6

Postby Quade » Sun Jul 12, 2015 11:59 am

Cache chunks have little to do with the blocks of headers downloaded.

I'm not 100% sure what you're reporting. Newsbin downloads headers and stores them in the import folder. Then processes the files in the import folder. The difference between 6.56 and 6.60 is in the older version these files were compressed. Now they're not. It reduces CPU to save and to load them but the file sizes are bigger.
User avatar
Quade
Eternal n00b
Eternal n00b
 
Posts: 44984
Joined: Sat May 19, 2001 12:41 am
Location: Virginia, US

Registered Newsbin User since: 10/24/97

Re: caching differences between 6.5 and 6.6

Postby cat_man » Sun Jul 12, 2015 6:36 pm

What I'm reporting is that 6.50 is faster at completing header processing than 6.60RC4 (and earlier RC's), ie finishing the import of all the group files in the import folder. It may have lessened cpu overhead to not have to compress/decompress, but on my pc it is slower. Just FYI , it may not follow on others environments.
User avatar
cat_man
Seasoned User
Seasoned User
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:40 am
Location: Texas

Registered Newsbin User since: 04/08/05


Return to Newsbin Version 6 Beta Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests