Quade wrote:How many items do you have in the download list? You're the only person reporting this so, I'm skeptical it's a widespread problem.
IdontexistM8 wrote:Normal and fill server behaviour as mentioned by the OP in this thread.
The option that once a chunk has been filled due to a missing part that Newsbin returns exclusively to the normal/primary server for the rest of the file rather than treating servers equally. This would be particular useful for 50mb+ rars, and especially so for when someone inexplicably posts an unseparated 700mb file of whatever flavour.
KilJaden wrote:IdontexistM8 wrote:Normal and fill server behaviour as mentioned by the OP in this thread.
The option that once a chunk has been filled due to a missing part that Newsbin returns exclusively to the normal/primary server for the rest of the file rather than treating servers equally. This would be particular useful for 50mb+ rars, and especially so for when someone inexplicably posts an unseparated 700mb file of whatever flavour.
The new 6 Alpha has the fill mechanism per chunk now instead of per file like it used to have , since this one is more fill block account friendly : you only ask from you're fill server the missing chunk rather than the whole file like it does now in 5.5x series.
[NZB]
AutoDownload=1
richy99 wrote:why not just password protect newsbin on start up?
jackholexxxx wrote:I occasionally let others use this machine and newsbin. Also, the read posts are still on disk. I am sure there are things stored in the .DB files that can be retrieved as well.
"C:\Program Files\NewsBin\nbpro.exe" "C:\Documents and Settings\Dexter\Application Data\Newsbin\NBConfig.nbi
jackholexxxx wrote: I don't want certain things stored on disk, ever.
jackholexxxx wrote:What about LEO, Feds, MPAA, RIAA, etc. It is not only who you give access to your computer, but who may force access upon you. This was the part I was trying to dance around, thinking surely it will be obvious why these features would be useful. I know these measures I am proposing will not fully "protect" me. But why just leave the treasure map out for everyone to see.
richy99 wrote:hope you have disabled the swap file aswell then
DThor wrote:No need to dance. My comments stand, you're kidding yourself if you think deleting spools after every session protects you. If this issue keeps you up nights, best not to download what you're downloading. And seriously, you really think completely volitile apps are practical and the average user would ever want that option lurking in the background?
Anyway, the dev said he'd think about it, this is just my opinion.
DT
richy99 wrote:jackholexxxx wrote:What about LEO, Feds, MPAA, RIAA, etc. It is not only who you give access to your computer, but who may force access upon you. This was the part I was trying to dance around, thinking surely it will be obvious why these features would be useful. I know these measures I am proposing will not fully "protect" me. But why just leave the treasure map out for everyone to see.
hope you have disabled the swap file aswell then
itimpi wrote:richy99 wrote:hope you have disabled the swap file aswell then
...and the hard disk Do not forget that if investigators get really serious they are meant to be able to recover files even after they have been over-written.
richy99 wrote:you can manually clear the odomoter and the history filter but i guess you want everything automated
jackholexxxx wrote:I also find it sad that the prevailing attitude is "Well if they want it bad enough, they will find it, so lets not do anything to protect our privacy".
Return to V6 Technical Support
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests